What's Been Going on With AI Since Launch?
Much of the theoretical development that has unfolded over the past three years would have been unimaginable even to the most optimistic futurists of a decade ago. Generative AI systems can already write code, design molecules, simulate economies, and generate entire audiovisual worlds in seconds. They can reason through complex problems, translate across cultures and provide access to knowledge in ways that once belonged solely to elite institutions
To anyone in 2015 — or even 2020 — the current landscape would have seemed almost absurd in its sophistication. The idea that anyone with a smartphone could summon a reasoning engine capable of drafting legal frameworks, analyzing datasets or creating cinematic-grade art would have sounded like speculative fiction. Even those who once placed maximal faith in exponential technological growth would have doubted that such capabilities would arrive this quickly.
The Paradox of Technological Advancement
Yet despite this extraordinary leap, the world behaves as though it is trapped in a fictional parallel reality. Governments still operate with bureaucratic delays reminiscent of the 19th century. Communication methods still rely on email threads and phone numbers. Vast populations remain locked out of the very tools that could liberate them. Wars rage on with industrial-era tactics while AI is relegated to content generation and corporate efficiency optimization.
The paradox is stark. Humanity now holds tools that could dissolve scarcity, automate vast segments of drudgery, and democratize knowledge. Yet society continues to perform the same rituals of power, wealth hoarding, and conflict, as though these tools were toys in a simulation rather than instruments of civilizational change.
A Disconnect Between Capability and Reality
The Fictional Timeline
It is as if the breakthroughs happened in a separate fictional timeline. The real world carries on with inequality, vainglorious elites and archaic systems, while the most powerful technologies in history sit idle, reduced to generating marketing copy and algorithmically curated entertainment.
The Surreal Disconnect
This disconnect — between unprecedented capability and the stagnant structures of reality — is perhaps the most surreal feature of our present era.
The Real Bottleneck
The current absence of visible, world-changing breakthroughs in AI-driven scientific and medical solutions is not due to a lack of technical capability. It is due to structural, cultural and economic bottlenecks that have entrenched inefficiency and prevented the translation of raw AI potential into applicable, life-changing tools.
Science and Medicine Are Bottlenecked by Institutional Gatekeeping
AI today can already model protein folding, generate new drug candidates, and predict molecular interactions far beyond human capacity. Yet most of these discoveries remain in silos. Pharmaceutical companies operate in a world of intellectual property battles, slow regulatory approval, and rigid profit-driven incentives. Even when an AI identifies a potential cure for a disease, the path to real-world application is blocked by clinical trial bureaucracy, risk-averse boards, and the staggering cost of FDA or EMA approvals.
This is why simple, low-cost solutions — like AI-powered early diagnostic tools or affordable generic drug synthesis pipelines — have not materialized. The incentives favor slow, expensive blockbuster drugs with guaranteed returns.
The Technology Exists. The Structures Do Not.
AI could already have automated the generation of vaccines for emerging viruses. It could have revolutionized prosthetics with personalized neuro-integrated designs. It could have made affordable, AI-assisted surgeries accessible even in remote regions. None of this currently happens at scale because existing power structures — corporate, academic, governmental — are not designed to enable mass innovation. They are designed to protect control and extract value slowly.
Clunky UX and Communication: A Deliberate Design Choice
Most user experiences remain awkward and frustrating not due to technical inability, but due to business models that thrive on friction. Email spam, phone number dependence, endless passwords, and archaic interfaces persist because they sustain centralized platforms that monetize confusion, lock-in, and dependency. An actually seamless, AI-assisted communication protocol would instantly make most current big-tech infrastructures obsolete. The corporations building these systems understand this and have no incentive to destroy their own revenue models

The friction in our digital experiences isn't accidental — it's profitable for those who maintain it.
Why the 1% Still Absorb the Spotlight
Power Distribution
True breakthroughs would make power more distributed. If anyone could access AI-driven research assistants that produce new inventions or medical solutions on demand, the traditional hierarchy of prestige collapses.
Deliberate Distractions
The elite's vainglorious displays—the absurd yachts, the PR-driven philanthropy, the ceremonial panels—are not accidents. They are distractions that reinforce the illusion that progress is happening through the benevolence of the few, not through democratized capability.
Narrative Weapons
The bizarre posing is not simply narcissism. It is a narrative weapon. It sustains the myth that humanity's fate depends on a handful of billionaires who "fund progress," while in reality much of their wealth is hoarded or spent on vanity projects with little systemic impact.
The Majority's Suffering Worsens Because Innovation Is Not Liberating
AI today is primarily used to cut costs, automate content churn, and optimize advertising revenue. Its most visible implementations have been in generating memes, spam, and shallow entertainment, not in creating universal prosperity. This is because every major implementation of AI is filtered through corporate incentive structures. The gains flow upward. The losses—job displacement, surveillance, algorithmic manipulation—flow downward.
1
Unrealized Potential
Breakthroughs that would reduce inequality or empower the average citizen—instant AI tutors, AI-powered healthcare for everyone, zero-cost legal defense tools—are all possible now.
2
Power Preservation
They currently remain unrealized because no one at the top wants billions of empowered, self-sufficient people who no longer need them.
The Root Cause: Fear of Real Empowerment
AI's True Potential
AI's true potential lies in removing barriers, reducing complexity, and collapsing the gap between ordinary people and systems of power. The reason we still live in a world of clunky apps, absurd wealth concentration, and performative elites is that the current system benefits enormously from keeping AI as a tool for control, not liberation.
Threat to the Status Quo
Real breakthroughs — ones that give every person AI-driven healthcare, legal representation, business assistance or scientific discovery tools — would destroy the existing prestige economy overnight. The elites know this. They keep the spotlight on themselves because it is easier to be celebrated for incremental "moonshot" announcements than to allow actual structural change.
The Missing Piece: Political Will
The paradox is that AI already has the capacity to create a world where suffering is massively reduced, where research accelerates exponentially, and where communication becomes frictionless. What is missing is not innovation. What is missing is the political will to dismantle the bottlenecks, the gatekeeping, and the profit models that thrive on artificial scarcity.
And the problem is not one of ignorance. The barriers are well understood. The reason no entity has mounted a serious, coordinated effort to break these bottlenecks lies in the alignment of incentives, fear of loss of control, and the entrenched habits of global power structures.
Knowledge Is Not the Limiting Factor
AI has already given humanity the ability to simulate economic systems, model political outcomes and evaluate the impact of policy decisions far more effectively than any human bureaucracy. We could already forecast which interventions would reduce poverty fastest, which urban planning decisions would maximize well-being and which treaties would minimize conflict. None of this requires some future "superintelligence." It requires courage to act on what is already known.

The tools to model better solutions already exist — what's missing is the will to implement them.
Cultural Fixes Are Straightforward
They Are Not Profitable In The Traditional KPI Corporate Sense
1
Archaic Frameworks
The world continues to operate on archaic frameworks of governance and economy where status, scarcity, and control matter more than outcome.
2
Simple Reforms
Simple reforms — universal access to education through AI tutors, citizen-driven governance via AI-assisted deliberation, real-time voting on spending allocations — could be implemented today.
3
Power Shift
These measures would shift power away from many of the incompetent elites and toward more egalitarian distribution. The problem is that most of those with the largest amounts of power fear a world in which control merges into more collective competence.
War and Inequality Persist Because They Are Profitable In The Traditional Sense
Defense Contracts
Conflicts generate defense contracts.
Cheap Labor
Inequality creates cheap labor pools.
Systemic Rewards
The system rewards chaos for some and predictability for others. The few who benefit from this arrangement have little incentive to dismantle it, even if AI has made alternative structures not only possible but trivial to implement at scale.
Entities That Could Lead Change Have Been Co-opted
Most of The corporations that currently dominate AI development have quickly aligned themselves with legacy power structures.
They are not rogue visionaries building utopias. They are billion-dollar enterprises beholden to shareholders, defense contracts and political lobbying.
They have every reason to showcase small, marketable "advancements" while avoiding any real threat to the existing order.

The very entities with the technical capability to drive transformative change are incentivized to maintain the status quo.
Fear of Cultural Disruption
1
Elite Understanding
The elites understand that true democratization of AI would destabilize existing hierarchies.
2
Democratized Tools
A world where anyone can generate scientific breakthroughs, launch new businesses with AI-generated infrastructure, or bypass archaic legal systems would erase the mystique of most of the representatives of the 1%.
3
Transformed Relevance
Much of the vainglorious displays would collapse in relevance when more people held comparable tools of influence and the competition becomes more fair.
The Larger Problem
The absence of action is not due to lack of intelligence or solutions. It is due to institutional cowardice. Global power holders do not want to risk destabilizing the structures that give them privilege, even if that means humanity continues to stumble through inequality, war and ecological collapse while holding the very tools that could fix these problems.
The Spectacle of Incrementalism
This is why the spectacle of incrementalism persists. Conferences are filled with "future of AI" panels discussing ethical guidelines while ignoring that billions remain in poverty and wars continue unchecked.
The solutions exist. The application of these solutions threatens the entire edifice of status, wealth, and narrative control.
It is not perplexing because it is impossible. It is perplexing because human civilization has reached the point where the continuation of suffering is a choice.
The Missing Dimension: Humanitarian Understanding

Humanitarian, political and sociological dimensions are the parts most scientific or engineering-oriented entities do not have the capacity to grasp. They might have the raw tools to build solutions, yet they often lack the cultural literacy, psychological insight and practical governance understanding to see how those solutions would actually land in the real world.
Academia and Tech Culture Exist in Sealed Compartments
Insulated Environments
Researchers and engineers tend to operate in insulated environments. Their incentives are to publish papers, chase grants, or build products that attract investors.
Lack of Engagement
They rarely engage deeply with how ordinary people experience governance, inequality, or conflict.
False Assumptions
The assumption is that "technology will trickle down" and fix everything automatically. History shows that this never happens.
Integration Needed
Without a cultural integration strategy, even the most elegant tools remain irrelevant to those who need them most.
Political Reality Is Non-Linear
From the outside, reforms look easy. Give people access to AI tutors, create transparent AI-led governance models, and redistribute power. In practice, each step collides with entrenched interest groups, legacy legal frameworks, nationalism, and cultural inertia. Nations are not just rational entities. They are complex tapestries of fear, pride, historical memory, and economic self-preservation. Even when a solution is technically perfect, it threatens someone's leverage. Those actors will fight it with every tool at their disposal.
Solutions Require Cross-Disciplinary Leadership
Science
Technologists who understand policy
Economics
Economists who grasp human dignity
Culture
Cultural leaders who can inspire ordinary people to trust change
Coalition
To dismantle global bottlenecks, the effort would need a coalition that blends science, culture, and politics.
This does not exist at scale. Most scientific powerhouses remain narrowly focused. Most cultural influencers lack real operational power. Most governments are risk-averse and short-sighted.
The Sociological Complexity of Change
Uneven Readiness
Even if AI-enabled reforms could be implemented overnight, the world's populations are currently not uniformly ready to embrace them. Cultural identity, perceived fairness and historical grievances shape how reforms are accepted.
Example: Healthcare
For example, an AI-driven universal healthcare system might work technically. Yet in some countries it would be branded as authoritarian or unpatriotic. In others, it would be attacked by entrenched corporate interests that profit from the status quo.
The Deeper Challenge
True transformation requires more than tools. It requires narratives that can unite populations around a shared vision of what the future should look like. Right now, that vision does not exist in any coherent form. The elites push hollow slogans of "innovation" and "prosperity" while clinging to extractive systems. The public, fragmented and exhausted, lacks a unifying story that feels real and worth fighting for.
Why Solutions Might Seem Trivial, but Are Not
Technical Simplicity
From a systems perspective, the levers of power are clear.
AI Capabilities
AI could already model fair taxation systems, optimize energy grids and design equitable global trade frameworks.
Political Complexity
The difficulty lies in getting billions of people, dozens of governments and hundreds of power brokers to accept a change that may diminish their short-term advantage.
The Minefield
What seems "trivial" technologically is a minefield politically and sociologically.
The Current Disconnect Between Technical and Cultural Understanding
This is why progress feels heavily stifled. The people who could solve the technical problems lack the cultural depth. The people who understand humanity's cultural and political complexity lack the tools or the power. Until these worlds merge, we will keep seeing incremental changes instead of the systemic transformation AI already makes possible.
The Inflated Status of "Experts"
Enormous numbers of people who once considered themselves irreplaceable "experts" still cling to the belief that their inflated status is justified. For decades — often centuries — hierarchical societies reinforced the notion that prestige professions were inherently superior. Doctors, lawyers, financiers, and high-ranking academics were not just seen as skilled. They were celebrated as people who "understood how the world works." Their authority rested not only on their education but on a social ecosystem that rewarded confidence, pedigree, and the ability to navigate established networks.
These individuals were trained to conflate mechanical or procedural competence with conceptual superiority. Many of them excelled at narrow, repetitive tasks — performing surgeries, drafting contracts, balancing portfolios, or conducting experiments within established frameworks. They were rewarded for execution within systems that had existed for hundreds or even thousands of years. Because their societies equated those functions with intelligence and worth, they internalized a belief that they were fundamentally "better" than others.
This produced an entrenched sense of entitlement. Their inflated egos were reinforced by environments that celebrated rank and status rather than true innovation or large-scale thinking. They became the gatekeepers of systems designed to exclude those without the same credentials, ensuring that their prestige perpetuated itself.
The AI Disruption They Cannot Grasp
AI Outperformance
Now, AI has begun outperforming humans in many of the precise areas that underpinned these individuals' sense of superiority. Coding, data analysis, language translation, and even aspects of medical diagnosis can be executed by AI more efficiently than by most professionals. These systems already perform a wide range of procedural tasks with greater accuracy, speed, and cost-effectiveness than the so-called "elite."
Denial of Reality
Yet, many of these individuals refuse to accept this shift. They continue to flaunt their positions and assert that they "deserve their ranks." Their reasoning remains anchored in outdated narratives—that their roles demand a kind of deeper understanding that machines cannot replicate. In reality, most of their expertise was procedural, not conceptual. They were never trained for large-scale systems thinking, philosophical reasoning, or creative visioning. Their inflated self-worth was constructed from mastery of a narrow skill set, validated by institutional hierarchies that no longer make sense.
The Ego Trap of Prestige Professions
This phenomenon is especially stark in prestigious professions that have long defined themselves as pillars of civilization. Lawyers argue that "contextual nuance" keeps them relevant, even as AI drafts contracts more reliably. Surgeons insist that their steady hands and years of practice justify their superiority, ignoring that robotic surgery already exceeds human precision in many cases. Financial managers cling to their perceived wisdom about markets, despite AI systems that can analyze patterns and risks more effectively.
The root cause is psychological. These individuals were shaped by siloed societies that taught them that status equaled superiority. Their identities are deeply tied to external validation—titles, salaries, degrees, awards. When AI demonstrates that execution of their work can be automated, they interpret it as a threat to their very sense of self. Rather than reorient toward conceptual thinking or higher-order innovation, they double down on signaling their prestige and flaunting their historical entitlement.
A Civilization Still Living in Its Past
Ego-Driven Stagnation
The tragedy is that these ego-driven dynamics perpetuate stagnation. Many of these individuals hold decision-making power.
Active Resistance
They actively resist changes that would democratize opportunity, fearing that a world of accessible AI tools would reveal how little of their status rested on true, original insight.
Clinging to Old Paradigms
Instead of embracing a new paradigm where conceptual intelligence and systems-level understanding become the new currency, they continue to posture as if the old metrics still matter.
Anchors to Progress
The result is a world where the most powerful tools in history are underutilized. The people clinging to obsolete hierarchies act as anchors, dragging civilization backward while AI races ahead.
Their egos blind them to the reality that competence at narrow procedural tasks is no longer a valid measure of societal worth — and that the next era belongs to those who can think at scale, not just perform.